[FFmpeg-devel] xvmc_render.h ---> xvmc.h

[Benoit Fouet]

On 02/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> On 2/11/09, Benoit Fouet <benoit.fouet at free.fr> wrote:
>   
>> On 02/11/2009 01:04 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On 02/09/2009 12:58 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On 2/9/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:20:02AM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> I still oppose the change as it brings more confusion
>>>>>>>> and have no advantages of any sort.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> This seems a funny argument, considering _render is used nowhere else
>>>>>>> (so it is a mystery what it is supposed to signify), and even if
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> i dont want to disturb you guys while trying to repaint the bike but
>>>>>> what about vdpau_pixfmt.h ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> How do you dare to give actually reasonable proposition! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> I still prefer _render as something done by 3D render,
>>>>> however I cannot deny that this header contains structures placed
>>>>> in pixfmt buffers and passed only when this pixel format is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just hope it won't be confused with PixFmtInfo.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> has Michael's proposal been completely forgotten ?
>>>> it looks nice when you look at the file content.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I just asked whether there is
>>>
>>>   Anybody who prefers xvmc_pixfmt.h over xmvc.h?
>>>
>>> Are you such a person?
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> yes... but I don't think it matters much...
>>     
>
> Does this also mean that you are OK with keeping the things as they are now?
> But if there is some _really good reason_ for change you'd prefer xvmc_pixfmt.
> (please give full answer, not just yes/no;)
>   

if this file has to be renamed for one reason or another (I must admit
that right now, this just looks like details to me), I'd prefer it to be
renamed in the longer form Michael proposed than in the shorter form
that Diego proposed...
Is that a long enough answer ? :)

Ben