[FFmpeg-devel] xvmc_render.h ---> xvmc.h

[Ivan Kalvachev]

On 2/11/09, Benoit Fouet <benoit.fouet at free.fr> wrote:
> On 02/11/2009 01:04 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2009 12:58 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/9/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:20:02AM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I still oppose the change as it brings more confusion
>>>>>>> and have no advantages of any sort.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This seems a funny argument, considering _render is used nowhere else
>>>>>> (so it is a mystery what it is supposed to signify), and even if
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> i dont want to disturb you guys while trying to repaint the bike but
>>>>> what about vdpau_pixfmt.h ?
>>>>>
>>>> How do you dare to give actually reasonable proposition! ;)
>>>>
>>>> I still prefer _render as something done by 3D render,
>>>> however I cannot deny that this header contains structures placed
>>>> in pixfmt buffers and passed only when this pixel format is used.
>>>>
>>>> I just hope it won't be confused with PixFmtInfo.
>>>>
>>> has Michael's proposal been completely forgotten ?
>>> it looks nice when you look at the file content.
>>>
>>
>> I just asked whether there is
>>
>>   Anybody who prefers xvmc_pixfmt.h over xmvc.h?
>>
>> Are you such a person?
>>
>>
>
> yes... but I don't think it matters much...

Does this also mean that you are OK with keeping the things as they are now?
But if there is some _really good reason_ for change you'd prefer xvmc_pixfmt.
(please give full answer, not just yes/no;)