[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] Multiple inclusion guards in headers

Måns Rullgård mans
Sun Aug 17 19:29:27 CEST 2008

Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:

> This is the second issue id like to see clarified
> Do we require headers that do not need multiple inclusion guards out of
> technical reasons to have multiple inclusion guards?
> technical here is speed, compiler warnings or errors, or spec compliance


> My vote is of course, no, as it makes the headers bigger and thus means
> more to read aka worse readability.

That's the most ridiculous argument I've heard in a while, especially
from someone capable of reading and comprehending Intel SSE code.

Do you have any TECHNICAL arguments for skipping those two lines?

M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list