[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Sechole in gcc 3.3+ and 4.*

Dave Dodge dododge
Sat Apr 12 06:18:41 CEST 2008

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> If C meant this to be undefined they could have said so explicitly like they
> do for >> and signed numbers.

They do, over in "Terms and Definitions" (section 3) where signed
integer overflow is given as an explicit example of something that
causes undefined behavior.

                                                  -Dave Dodge

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list