[FFmpeg-devel] Dirac Golomb decoder [PATCH]
Reimar Döffinger
Reimar.Doeffinger
Wed Aug 15 00:29:21 CEST 2007
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:12:23PM +0200, Balatoni Denes wrote:
> Sorry to butt in the discussion, but
>
> Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:52-kor Michael Niedermayer ezt ?rta:
> > > * Copyright (c) 2003 Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2007 Marco Gerards <marco at gnu.org>
> > > *
> >
> > as reimar already said, we are affraid of ending up with hundreads of
> > copyright lines ...
> > if you want your name in the file, i think maybe something like
> >
> > /**
> > * this function finds the foobar.
> > * @author (copyright) Marco Gerards <marco at gnu.org>
> >
> > above functions you wrote, would be a compromise
>
> IMO if somebody contributes some not very trivial lines, and he explicitly
> wants his copyright to that part recognized, he should not be prevented to do
> so - that sounds fishy to me, in an illegal way.
There is nothing illegal here, I think nobody would ever just remove
such a line without at least trying very hard to get the authors
permission.
Also for all I know those "Copyright..." lines are little more than a
historic leftover without much meaning nowadays.
But so far I can't remember a case where this was a issue in the end. If
it ever happens to be it will be treated the same as any other change
that some of use consider ugly: It will be discussed, possibly modified
and either applied or not (please notice that unless I misread it,
neither I nor Michael said we would not accept adding such a notice, we
just voiced our concerns - though mine might have sounded a bit strong,
but pure data tables are one case where I would actually strongly oppose
such a notice, claiming copyright on "trivial" (with respect to creativity)
things is not something we should foster).
Greetings,
Reimar D?ffinger
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list