[Ffmpeg-devel] inttypes.h
Steve Lhomme
steve.lhomme
Wed Nov 22 09:02:29 CET 2006
Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:50:37AM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote:
>> Brian Brice wrote:
>>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>> Brian Brice <bbrice at newtek.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Those typedefs were never safe, since they are not guaranteed to be
>>>> the same as those from inttypes.h. Just make your mingw inttypes.h
>>>> visible to vc++ and all should be fine. Alternatively, you could take
>>>> the hint that vc++ isn't very well suited for compiling programs. (Is
>>>> it useful for anything else?)
>>> I can have a work around for this, but I thought it was just nice that
>>> one was available already. VC++ did very well linking up to ffmpeg's
>>> libraries (not compiling those libraries!). It was nice to have that
>>> alternative to inttypes.h available in the "public" headers of ffmpeg.
>>> Thanks.
>> You can use whatever compiler you want with FFMPEG, as long as it's gcc
>> 3 or 4.
>
> Steve, STFU with the typical bullshit. You can use absolutely any
> C99-compliant compiler, as well as most C89 compilers with the key
> useful extensions which were standardized in C99 such as named struct
> initializers. If you find code in ffmpeg that cannot be compiled with
> any C99 compiler, report it as a bug and it will surely be fixed. On
> the other hand if your compiler is broken then complain to the
> compiler vendor, not this list!!
Is the inline assembly used in FFMPEG defined in C99 or is it a "GNU"
extension and will be discarded by another C99 compiler than gcc ?
Anyway I don't use any other C99 compiler. Maybe Borland would qualify
and probably Intel too. But I don't use them.
--
robUx4 on blog <http://robux4.blogspot.com/>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list