[Ffmpeg-devel] [bugs] grabbing v4l2 -> buffer underflow ; packet too large ; pcm_s16le vs mp2

Erik Slagter erik
Fri Feb 24 15:45:58 CET 2006

On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 14:37 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:

> I'm not saying we shouldn't try to get it right.  However, I just don't
> get the point in making the format so complicated for no apparent gain.

I guess we'll have to live with the iso way of doing things. The
alternative is non-open most of the time... But yeah, complaint very
much sustained. Makes me think of the OSI network protocol stack :-(

> > For myself I'd rather put effort in mp4 than in more or
> > less obsoleted technology like mpeg1/2 containers.
> Obsoleted?  Do you ever watch TV?  DVD?  That's MPEG2 all the way.

Even better: DVD and DVB. I probably didn't make myself clear using the
concept "obsolete". What I mean, is it worth the wile putting effort in
combinations of containers and codecs that will probably not become
ehrrrm, very popular. The popular combinations are already supported by
ffmpeg, afaik. An exception would be mpeg4 in TS and h264 in TS, these
we'll probably going to see more and more. IIRC you already patched the
TS (de)muxer to support mpeg4, I really don't know about h264.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2771 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20060224/21a680b6/attachment.bin>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list