[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Compiling FFmpeg using ISO/C89 compiler

Måns Rullgård mru
Wed Dec 6 21:18:09 CET 2006

Steve Lhomme <slhomme at divxcorp.com> writes:

> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>> anyway if you want to have some things like RV40 support, why
>>>> dont you just get divxnetworks to sponsor it like googles summer
>>>> of code (though of course the requirement for final payment
>>>> should be a working decoder in svn not just something somewhere
>>>> which someone else then has to cleanup and integrate)
>>> DivX, Inc. is not called DivXNetworks anymore :) And they are already
>>> sponsoring their own employees to improve FFMPEG ;)
>> Yeah, and see how well that's working.  If you instead paid *real*
>> ffmpeg developers to do the job properly it would probably be cheaper
>> for you in the longer term, and everybody would benefit.
> Feel free to ask DivX, Inc. some money to do it. I will tell them how
> productive you are.

Sorry, I don't have time.

>>> Plus RealVideo decoding is not really a priority for us. But that
>>> makes DrDivX one of the very few tools that can convert many
>>> matroska files (RV9) to something more usable.
>> Eh?  I'm sure mencoder can do that too.  I have my opinions about
>> mplayer/mencoder code quality, but something tells me it's no worse
>> than your code.
> Instead of talking about my code that you haven't seen, why don't you
> fix that MPEG2 crash that was described in march 2006 ?

Because *you have still not provided a sample* that reproduces it.

M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list