[FFmpeg-cvslog] r14484 - in trunk/libavcodec: audioconvert.c audioconvert.h

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 07:30:07PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:57:45PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:45:21PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:33:50PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > no, audioconvert.h already incldues avcodec.h.
> > > > > > the #include "avcodec.h" does nothing its just because the diego-mans
> > > > > > rule says it should be there.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So far we have Mans, Baptiste and Diego in favor, with only you
> > > > > against..
> > > > 
> > > > ehh?
> > > > 
> > > > mans clearly said he considers common.h and internal.h as exceptions
> > > > baptiste said he still has to think about if the #include of
> > > > avcodec.h in audioconvert.c should be there or if audioconvert.h is sufficient
> > > > And the wanderer clearly said he is against the include every header
> > > > in every c and h file directly and redundantly.
> > > 
> > > So the Wanderer suddenly turned into an FFmpeg developer?
> > 
> > Right after you turned into a C developer.
> 
> Well, you wanted to invalidate my vote in MPlayer because you claimed I
> was not enough of a C developer. 

I do remember claiming that you are not a C developer, i do not remember
trying to invalidate anyones vote. Even less so do i remember any recent
votes related to mplayer, Ive asked for one about the mplayer leadership
situation but i do not remember that vote ever happening.


> Surely I then have the same right to
> question the legitimacy of people participating in discussions, do I
> not?

yes, If you want to limit a vote about C code to people contributing to
the C code or actively contributing to it that is fine. This would exclude the
wanderer as well as you though.


> 
> > for non C see:
> > r12427, r12424, r4447, r4371, r4369, r4366
> > 
> > He also very often helps with anything related to english grammer, the best
> > way to say someting, ...
> 
> I never doubted that.
> 

> > And if he doesnt have a write account ATM id be happy to offer him one, or
> > can you point to a single patch/change from him that would have been wrong?
> 
> He does not have a write account ATM.

Is this because he does not want one or because you do not want to give him
one?


> 
> > > My impression is that he just enjoys arguing for the sake of it.  Which
> > > is bad, as it causes extra traffic and lengthens discussions
> > > considerably.
> > 
> > Anyone who does not happen to agree with you 100% should be lynched, i know.
> 
> Unlike you, I never asked for anybody to be lynched.

I wouldnt have to ask if you would borrow me your bloody pitchfork once.

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is
On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem).
On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number
of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/attachments/20080804/f303a77c/attachment.pgp>