[NUT-devel] [nut]: r604 - docs/nutissues.txt

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:17:50PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > +Also it is inefficient for very small frames, AMR-NB for example has 6-32
> > > > +bytes per frame.
> > > 
> > > I don't think anyone really cares that much about efficiency when
> > > storing shit codecs in NUT. Obviously any good codec will use large
> > > frame sizes or compression will not be good.
> > 
> > Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I think AMR currently is the best
> > quality speech codec...
> 
> No, PCM is the best quality speech codec. :) :) :)

nonsense, live speech is much higher quality. ;)))


> AMR is good for shit-quality applications like telephone, but not for
> anything where you want the audio to actually be recognizable.

have you ever tested AMR and qcelp or are you just quessing?

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have
asymptotical amounts of data
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/nut-devel/attachments/20080212/3ef2339d/attachment.pgp>