[NUT-devel] [nut]: r609 - docs/nutissues.txt

[Rich Felker]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:54:03PM +0100, michael wrote:
> Author: michael
> Date: Tue Feb 12 13:54:02 2008
> New Revision: 609
> 
> Log:
> 3rd option
> 
> 
> Modified:
>    docs/nutissues.txt
> 
> Modified: docs/nutissues.txt
> ==============================================================================
> --- docs/nutissues.txt	(original)
> +++ docs/nutissues.txt	Tue Feb 12 13:54:02 2008
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ How do we identify the sample format
>  
>  A. fourcc
>  B. extradata
> +C. New field in the stream header
>  
>  
>  Issue pcm-interleaving
> @@ -160,3 +161,4 @@ How do we identify the interleaving
>  
>  A. fourcc
>  B. extradata
> +C. New field in the stream header

Michael, would you please stop this unprofessional creation of issues?
The topic was discussed thoroughly on the list somewhere between 2 and
4 years ago and it was concluded that a stream header field that just
applies to a single format (raw pcm) does not belong in the generic
stream header. Extradata or the format identifier (fourcc) is the
place for format-specific information. It's not my intent to quiet
dissent but rather to avert jumping back in time by 3 years or so on
issues that were already treated thoroughly at the time!

Rich