[NUT-devel] Another suggestion for broadcast [PATCH]

Rich Felker dalias at aerifal.cx
Mon Feb 11 05:14:38 CET 2008


On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:19:29AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Anyway if you say a timestamp would be better, i suspect rich would be harder
> to convince than me.

Not necessarily. If something new is needed, I want it to be
whatever's best (hopefully without being invasive). A good question to
ask is what stage in the content generation the buffering data would
be generated at and if the choice of what to store would influence
that...

Rich



More information about the NUT-devel mailing list