[NUT-devel] huge vs. damaged forward_ptrs in packets

Rich Felker dalias at aerifal.cx
Thu Mar 9 22:29:20 CET 2006


On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:44:48PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> personally i think a fixed N would be the best solution

OK, that's fine with me. The reason I was originally against it was
mainly my misunderstanding. I'm certainly happy with anything between
4k and 16k and probably anything between 1k and 64k. Sizes like 512,
1k, 2k, and 4k are nice in that they correspond to sector sizes on
common media (damage usually comes in whole sectors or not at all).
But it really doesn't matter too much to me.

Rich




More information about the NUT-devel mailing list