[MPlayer-users] Re: divx 6

[Ivan Kowalenko]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> choice of MP4 wasn't because it was a great container, just a common
>> one.
>
> It's not common at all, thank goodness.

No, we only see it for some H.264 content, Apple trailers, iPod  
video, PSP video, Nero encoded video, QuickTime produced video, some  
ffmpeg produced video, and a couple other applications. That's not  
common at all.

>> If people wanted great containers, we'd see more Matroska and
>> OGM files floating around, instead of AVI.
>
> Now you've proved your incompetence too. OGM is the absolute worst
> container in all respects.

I'd call OGM an improvement over AVI. Given that you can at least use  
multiple audio and subtitle streams without breaking it. I rather  
dislike it's selectivity in the codecs it can and cannot use, but I'd  
still use it over AVI. However, if you could clarify how "OGM is the  
absolute worst container" I might be swayed.

> When will people learn to stop talking
> about things they don't understand and pretending to be experts on
> them??

I'm hardly pretending to be an expert. I've stated what I know from  
my understanding. I'm open to being corrected, if you could explain  
instead of just calling me an idiot.

> It reminds me of: http://bash.org/?20759

"I blasted the Bug Object in the Hall Object with my Gun Object!"  
"Notice how GUI it is." ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEXNJO187keuSyQSQRArTDAJ9Zyu9AOVgqKrDVBApR6Z5oJjS2kgCeMOud
QnVJE5QC8ccQiFlSzGM83UA=
=o5z8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----