[MPlayer-dev-eng] x264 encoding over lavc [PATCH]

Diego Biurrun diego at biurrun.de
Tue Jun 13 18:59:52 CEST 2006


On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:29:10PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
> 
> Second: should these options be documented? I have mixed options about 
> this. In general, I'm in favor of documenting whatever exists; on the 
> other hand, I can easily forsee users getting quite mixed up, especially 
> since some of the options have slightly different names, like 
> b_pyramid/bpyramid or trell/trellis.

My philosophy has always been that everything should be documented.
Completeness is one of the most important aspects of good documentation.
If option names are confusing or awkward to use, then this is a problem
in the interface design.

Diego



More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list