[MPlayer-cvslog] r19258 - trunk/DOCS/tech/oggless-xiph-codecs.txt

[Diego Biurrun]

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:28:48PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > 
> > > 1. we would have to look at git and carefully compare it to svn
> > 
> > The problem is why only git?  There seem to be more distributed revision
> > control systems than there are hairs on a yeti's body.  Off the top of
> > my head: git, cogito, svk, mercurial, darcs, bazaar, bazaar-ng, arch,
> > ArX, monotone, codeville, dcvs, libresource, superversion, vesta, plus
> > bitkeeper and a few more proprietary ones.  There are probably more ..
> 
> propriatary ones / bitkeeper are out of question

Yes, sure, I just listed them for completeness.

> from what remains git seems to be mentioned far more often then the
> others, of course should the others be considered too if we really
> want to change the version control system used and somehow iam not
> opposed at all to doing that ...

I think you're blowing the troubles we're having with Subversion out of
proportion.  Overall I'm very content with the way it's working.

Diego