[MEncoder-users] new doom9 codec comparission (submission)

Guillaume POIRIER poirierg at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 21:14:52 CET 2005

On 12/15/05, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Matthias Wieser wrote:
> > If the decoder would be the single cause for this then it should be no
> > problem to capture some snapshots which show the difference between
> > ffdshow and atme's decoder. We don't need to guess if atme is good or
> > bad. We can measure it.
> I never even heard of atme before this test, wtf is it?


It's "just" the (French) company that won last year's codec comparison.


> > At least the last comparison showed quite big
> > differences - for example some video codecs did not show any raindrops
> > while other codecs preserved those fine details. It's highly unrealistic
> > that small, accumulated dct errors make raindrops disappear.
> We're only talking about two codecs here, lavc and xvid. I haven't
> seen doom9's screenshots. Would you care to point me at them.

2003 codec comparison

2004 codec comparison


MPlayer's doc is offline. Find some fresh one here:

More information about the MEncoder-users mailing list