[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

[Rémi Denis-Courmont]

Hi,

Le 30 avril 2024 22:15:10 GMT+03:00, "Ondřej Fiala" <ofiala at airmail.cc> a écrit :
>On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 9:06 PM CEST, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> I will take the replacement instead, thanks. Email is archaic. The
>> entire point is to get away from email, not dress it up.
>> SourceHut usage would likely make me even less interested then today.
>>
>> - Hendrik
>I guess that depends on how (and with what) you use it. Using it with
>Gmail UI for example is obviously not a great idea. No idea whether you
>do, but if you do, you should be upset at Gmail, not email.

I don't use Gmail, and using email for review still sucks. No matter how you slice it, email was not meant for threaded code reviews.

Also while I can use git-send-email, not everyone can. And patches as attachments are simply awful. Unfortunately I can't dictate that people don't send patches that way.

>But you did not answer my question: which specific code review features
>are you missing?

Proper threaded reviews with state tracking, ability to collapse and expand context and files, and proper listing of open MR (*not* like patchwork).