[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mov.c: Guess video codec delay based on PTS while parsing MOV header.
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Wed Nov 22 14:43:23 EET 2017
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 01:21:45PM +0530, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> I was just shooting for a heuristic which works for most of the cases.
I do not think a heuristic is a good idea. Its not very hard to
compute this exactly. You just reorder using a 16 entry buffer and
keep track of what the largest size was that was actually needed.
Or a buffer that is increased in size whenever it would lead to
out of order output
[...]
> I can build a better heuristic by finding the frame with next min. PTS
> after Pmin and computing the distance between that frame and Pmin. However
> that will still fail for this example,
> 0, 3, 5, 1, 4, 2 . The delay computed will be 2 (because 2 frames between
> 0 and 1 ) but we need a buffer size of 3 .
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc
> > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:27:05PM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasi Inguva <isasi at google.com>
> > > ---
> > > libavformat/mov.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++
> > > tests/fate/mov.mak | 7 ++++++
> > > tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-1 | 3 +++
> > > tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-2 | 3 +++
> > > tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-3 | 3 +++
> > > 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-1
> > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-2
> > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/mov-guess-delay-3
> > >
> > > diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
> > > index fd170baa57..afb0d4ca5c 100644
> > > --- a/libavformat/mov.c
> > > +++ b/libavformat/mov.c
> > > @@ -3213,6 +3213,54 @@ static int64_t add_ctts_entry(MOVStts**
> > ctts_data, unsigned int* ctts_count, uns
> > > return *ctts_count;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void mov_guess_video_delay(MOVContext *c, AVStream* st) {
> > > + MOVStreamContext *msc = st->priv_data;
> > > + int ind;
> > > + int ctts_ind = 0;
> > > + int ctts_sample = 0;
> > > + int64_t curr_pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE;
> > > + int64_t min_prev_pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE;
> > > + int64_t prev_max_pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE;
> > > + int num_steps = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (st->codecpar->video_delay <= 0 && msc->ctts_data &&
> > > + st->codecpar->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_H264) {
> > > + st->codecpar->video_delay = 0;
> > > + for(ind = 0; ind < st->nb_index_entries && ctts_ind <
> > msc->ctts_count; ++ind) {
> > > + curr_pts = st->index_entries[ind].timestamp +
> > msc->ctts_data[ctts_ind].duration;
> > > +
> > > + // Everytime we encounter a new max_pts we reset num_steps
> > and compute again.
> > > + if (curr_pts > prev_max_pts) {
> > > + st->codecpar->video_delay = FFMIN(FFMAX(st->codecpar->video_delay,
> > num_steps), 16);
> > > + num_steps = 0;
> > > + prev_max_pts = curr_pts;
> > > + min_prev_pts = curr_pts;
> > > + } else {
> > > + // Compute delay as the length of the path from max PTS
> > to min PTS.
> > > + // Frames: I0 I1 B0 B1 B2
> > > + // PTS: 0 4 1 2 3 -> num_steps = delay = 1
> > (4->1)
> > > + //
> > > + // Frames: I0 I1 B1 B0 B2
> > > + // PTS: 0 4 2 1 3 -> num_steps = delay = 2
> > (4->2, 2->1)
> > > + if (min_prev_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) {
> > > + if (curr_pts < min_prev_pts) {
> > > + ++num_steps;
> > > + min_prev_pts = curr_pts;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > Can you explain why this algorithm is correct ?
> > (iam asking as i suspect it is not correct, but i may be wrong)
> >
> > What this should do is find the minimum buffer size to sort the stream
> > of frame timestamps.
> >
> >
> > [...]
> > --
> > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> >
> > Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
> > readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Take away the freedom of one citizen and you will be jailed, take away
the freedom of all citizens and you will be congratulated by your peers
in Parliament.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20171122/31d44801/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list