[FFmpeg-devel] Post-processing filter Documentation

[arwa arif]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:53:55PM +0530, arwa arif wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 02:30:29PM +0530, arwa arif wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Stefano Sabatini <
> stefasab at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On date Thursday 2015-01-29 03:46:42 +0530, Arwa Arif encoded:
> > > > > > I have updated the page with new images.
> > > > > > http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Postprocessing
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: probably you can improve the page layout by stripping the
> black
> > > > > top and bottom bands in the matrix reference.
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you exactly created the query image? Also please specify the
> > > > > information unit (200K = 200 Kbit/s, right?)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I used this command to create the query image:
> > > > ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -b:v 200k matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > What exactly needs to be done in benchmark section?
> > > > >
> > > > > I already suggested a command (please keep some context when
> > > > > replying), but Michael observed that the actual benchmark could be
> > > > > affected by I/O speed.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if there is a better way to benchmark the performance of a
> > > > > single filter. Using START/STOP_TIMER can be an idea but it would
> be
> > > > > probably a little awkward.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > So, which method should I follow to get the runtime?
> > >
> > > Either would work and as stefano seems to have no preferrance / hasnt
> > > replied i suggest to use the simpler
> > > also the input and output files can be placed in /dev/shm to avoid
> > > IO overhead this limits their size though so the video to test with
> > > cant be huge
> > >
> > >
> > I have updated the page: http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Postprocessing
> > I want to know if I should make a different table for becnhmark?
>
> yes, i think a seperate table would be better
>
>
Updated the documentation.


> thanks
>
> [...]
> --
> Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
> their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>