[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Clarifying the use of the scale filter interlace option

Mark Himsley mark at mdsh.com
Sat Mar 31 13:54:49 CEST 2012


On 29/03/2012 20:33, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:49:38AM +0100, Tim Nicholson wrote:

>>
>> Also unlike other cases -1 (auto) is not the default.
> 
> this could be changed if it works better overall

I made this point on 25/07/2011, with a patch. It was rejected because
the progressive videos used in fate tests were always flagged as
progressive in DV codecs so PSNR tests failed horribly.

It is my opinion that the fate tests should be changed, as the benefits
of -1 (auto) are huge.

-- 
Mark


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list