[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Make ff_url_split() and ff_url_join() public.
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Sun May 23 17:09:24 CEST 2010
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 05:28:03PM +0300, Martin Storsj? wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
> > On May 23, 2010, at 6:15 AM, Martin Storsj? <martin at martin.st> wrote:
> > >
> > > For what it's worth, a dynamically linked build of ffserver references
> > > these non-public functions from lavf:
> > >
> > > ff_inet_aton
> >
> > This one will never be made public, ffserver should use generic ipv6
> > functions.
>
> Yeah. But even in that case, we have a bit of a dilemma. If on a system
> where no getaddrinfo is available, should the fallbacks from lavf be
> exported so that ffserver can use them?
>
> Or should they all be moved out (including ff_network_init) to a separate
> libbrokenos, where all of them can be exported, as suggested every now and
> then?
people prefer to spend many days of bikesheding and flaming and pushing hacks
to other peoples code over creating libbrokenos and putting all the mess
there.
>
> > > ff_socket_nonblock
> >
> > This is one of those where win32 is posix-incompatible right? Ramiro
> > should tell us if it is sufficient and then it can be made public
> > maybe, or something...?
> >
> > > ff_url_split
> >
> > So if people like the current ff_url_join/split API, we should
> > probably make it public. I personally don't object, in fact I think
> > the API is quite nice.
> >
> > > ff_rtsp_parse_line
> > > rtp_get_local_rtcp_port
> > > rtp_get_local_rtp_port
> >
> > These we might have to think about a little, exporting these functions
> > literally is likely a bad idea.
>
> Except for these, it also uses
> ffm_read_write_index/ffm_write_write_index/ffm_set_write_index, but these
> actually are in avformat.h, since SVN rev 5. Using (de)muxer internal code
> like this without using the proper external interfaces isn't all that
> nice, but I'm not familiar enough with it to say how hard it would be to
> clean it up. And e.g. the RTSP header parsing code would have to be
> duplicated if we don't want to expose such things through public APIs.
shouldnt be hard to replace ffm by nut :)
patch welcome :)
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Thouse who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100523/27b8c6d7/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list