[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Parse H.264 is ASF.
Reimar Döffinger
Reimar.Doeffinger
Sat May 22 09:26:06 CEST 2010
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:52:07PM -0400, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:36:16PM -0400, Alex Converse wrote:
> >> My H.264 in asf samples[1] seem to put SPS and PPS in its own packet
> >> which creates all kinds of problems when remuxing (notably duplicate
> >> timestamps and an empty avcC). The attached patch turns on the parser
> >> to combine the packets. All my H.264 in asf samples are from the same
> >> source so if people have other samples to verify this on, let me know
> >> (I didn't find anything on samples.mphq.hu)
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] /incoming/h264_aac_zeropad.asf
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alex Converse
> >
> >> ?asfdec.c | ? ?2 ++
> >> ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >> cb107db59fdfb193268b15dfd1f5519a0ba1195f ?0003-Parse-H.264-in-ASF-because-SPS-PPS-lives-in-its-own-.patch
> >> From ecd789ea2122615205dcd2250715aae1463ef0b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Alex Converse <alex.converse at gmail.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:57:37 -0400
> >> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Parse H.264 in ASF because SPS+PPS lives in its own packet.
> >
> > microsoft doesnt fail to come up with new stupidities.
> > are there more than some pps/sps at the begin?
> > if yes your patch is ok
> > otherwise we maybe could try to disable parsing once we are past the pps/sps,
> > would make the code slightly faster
> >
>
> To risk sounding like a total goon, where would be a good place to
> turn the parser off with some sort of reliable synchronization? Would
> it be best to add some sort of PARSE_FLAG_ONCE and do it in the parser
> or would there still be giant parser overhead?
Is there a problem with just (mis-)using AVSTREAM_PARSE_HEADERS?
I suspect it won't work, but maybe to keep it analogous a AVSTREAM_PARSE_EXTRACT_HEADERS?
And IIRC there should be some parser already that switches itself of (by directly
returning the input data), but I couldn't find it right now.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list