[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Seeking to beginning of avi file skips first audio packet
Rodney Baker
rodney.baker
Mon May 17 17:45:56 CEST 2010
On Tue, 18 May 2010 01:11:52 John Stebbins wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 06:23 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > I missed the thing with the else, thanks for pointing that out. But I
> >
> >> don't understand your comment about cosmetic changes. I only indented
> >> where it was needed because of the added conditional. The alternative
> >> would be to have that chunk of code improperly indented after applying
> >> the patch where it was properly indented before applying the patch.
> >>
> >> Here's a fix for the else.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> - while(index>0 && st2->index_entries[index].pos > pos)
> >> - index--;
> >> - while(index+1 < st2->nb_index_entries &&
> >> st2->index_entries[index].pos < pos) - index++;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> + while(index>0 && st2->index_entries[index].pos > pos)
> >> + index--;
> >> + while(index+1 < st2->nb_index_entries &&
> >> st2->index_entries[index].pos < pos) + index++;
> >
> > this is a cosmetic change and requires to be in a patch without
> > functional changes
> >
> >
> > [...]
>
> What am I missing here? As I said above, if I submitted a patch without
> this indentation change, then the patched code would have improper
> indentation, while the unpatched code was indented correctly. Is this
> really what you want. I just don't understand the logic. Please help me
> understand this.
>
John,
FFmpeg devel policy is that cosmetics and functional changes are kept separate
and submitted in separate patches. No-one is saying don't do the cosmetics,
just split it into a separate patch to be applied after the functional
changes. That's all.
--
===================================================
Rodney Baker VK5ZTV
rodney.baker at iinet.net.au
===================================================
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list