[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libvpx: alt reference frame / lag
Vladimir Pantelic
pan
Wed Jun 30 07:10:57 CEST 2010
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:42:28AM -0400, John Koleszar wrote:
>> >> I've been through a lot of the advantages of keeping the data
>> >> separate, but it mostly boils down to staying out of the way of
>> >> applications that know what they're doing
>> >
>> > I think you are arguing that we should make things more complex for
>> > everyone for the sake of simplifying things for a use-case that
>> > currently does not exist and you don't specify well enough so we
>> > could suggest and alternative.
>>
>> I don't want to be in the business of saying what people can and can't
>> do with the codec, so I'm looking to provide flexibility. Yes, ARFs
>> are a new feature that other codecs don't have. No, I don't know all
>> the ways that people will find to use them yet.
>
> But we expect that ARFs will cause problems to some players.
apparently, those are starting to show up:
http://code.google.com/p/webm/issues/detail?id=109
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list