[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi test for 1-1 filters pixel format output

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Mon Jun 14 18:50:30 CEST 2010


On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:04:49PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> 
> > On date Monday 2010-06-14 12:28:51 +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
> >> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On date Sunday 2010-06-06 01:30:16 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> >> >> On date Wednesday 2010-06-02 23:42:32 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> >> >> > On date Monday 2010-05-24 22:12:25 +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
> >> >> > > Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> >> >> > [...]
> >> >> > > >> Did I review this?  Of course not, or I would have told you it breaks
> >> >> > > >> cross-builds (only if the test is run of course).
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Michael asked to commit, I did since the test is disabled so people
> >> >> > > > can start to work out the lavfi bugs.
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > He also asked me to review it.
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > > Feel free to fix it yourself or point out the problem it has.
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > I'll get to it eventually, but the problem is that the executable you
> >> >> > > build has to be run with $TARGET_EXEC and $TARGET_PATH.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Uhm, if that is true why tiny_psnr in regression-funcs.sh is not
> >> >> > defined like that.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Anyway my main problem seems that the lavfi-showfiltfmts I'm using
> >> >> > needs to include and link against the libav* libraries, in this being
> >> >> > different from the other testprogs, so it is failing to compile and I
> >> >> > don't even know if this crossbuilding thing is even able to support
> >> >> > that requirement.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Your help is welcome, regards.
> >> >> 
> >> >> M?ns-ping.
> >> >
> >> > I'll apply this patch or a variant in three days if I get no reply.
> >> 
> >> You will do no such thing.  The patch is WRONG.
> >
> > I know that,
> 
> Then this discussion is pointless.

So how exactly will this be resolved?
Can you elaborate on what is wrong?
Can you document how the cross compilation system you designed works
so other people than you can modify the scripts without breaking it?
Do we have some volunteer who is less busy and who could help maintain
the scripts in ffmpeg?



[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your
right to say it. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100614/b7493a4d/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list