[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] restoring binary compatibility with ffmpeg 0.5
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Sun Jun 13 02:51:23 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:25:08PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:19:52PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:46:23PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 05:03:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > tl;dr
> > >
> > > Anyway, I suggest we use the opportunity to break compatibility and
> > > change APIs. There are a lot of ifdefs that long for being removed.
> >
> > The problem is not so much the "now case", a single soname bump isnt
> > the big issue.
> > The big issue is that we would need to bump soname everytime we move a
> > symbol and thats not that rare ...
>
> What about breaking compatibility now anyway?
just because we can?
iam not in favor of that
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give
it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For
even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100613/64081d3e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list