[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] updated LGPL AC-3 decoder
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni
Tue May 8 20:25:30 CEST 2007
Hi
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:50:00PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:49:00PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>+ /* convert float to 16-bit integer */
> >>>>+ for(ch=0; ch<ctx->out_channels; ch++) {
> >>>>+ for(i=0; i<256; i++) {
> >>>>+ ctx->output[ch][i] = ctx->output[ch][i] * ctx->mul_bias +
> >>>>+ ctx->add_bias;
> >>>>+ }
> >>>>+ ctx->dsp.float_to_int16(ctx->int_output[ch], ctx->output[ch], 256);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>this isnt exactly ideal
> >>>the bias should be applied in some more efficient way like multiplying some
> >>>scaling coefficients, allthough i dunno if thats possible in AC3 ...
> >>
> >>I changed it so that the bias is multiplied in before the IMDCT along
> >>with the dialogue normalization and dynamic range compression.
> >>
> >>On top of your suggestions, I also did several other changes. I added
> >>dialogue normalization, put in some references to the specs in various
> >>places, fixed some bugs, simplified a few things, added more checks for
> >>error conditions, and removed some unused variables.
> >>
> >>I still can't figure out why the 5.1 decoding is so much slower than
> >>liba52. My guess is the downmixing, but it might be other things as
> >>well. Stereo decoding is pretty much the same speed on my system as
> >>liba52, but 5.1 decoding takes twice as long...
> >
> >
> > you mean 5.1 with downmixing to stereo or true 5.1 ?
> >
> > the downmixing should be done before the imdct, that way you dont need to
> > do the imdct on 6 channels but rather just on 2 (i didnt check where the
> > downmix is done exactly but its just IIRC ...)
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> >>+ /* the rest of the bsi. read twice for dual mono mode. */
> >>+ for(i=0; i<=(ctx->acmod == AC3_ACMOD_DUALMONO); i++) {
> >>+ ctx->dialnorm[i] = dialnorm_tbl[get_bits(gb, 5)]; // dialogue normalization
> >>+ if(get_bits1(gb))
> >>+ skip_bits(gb, 8); // skip compression gain
> >>+ if(get_bits1(gb))
> >>+ skip_bits(gb, 8); // skip language code
> >>+ if(get_bits1(gb))
> >>+ skip_bits(gb, 7); // skip audio production information
> >>+ } while(i--);
> >
> >
> > hmm for(){}while(); ?
>
> yeah, you haven't heard of that construct? ;)
>
> really though, mans is right, i missed that one when i converted it from
> a do{}while() to a for().
>
> > and patch looks ok
>
> great. now...
>
> Should I apply it all at once or try to go back to the original SoC code
> and do incremental changes? I looked back at the original, and my best
> guess is that I changed about 75% of the code. I could do it either way
> really.
incremental is better if its easy, but if you use some script to
automatically check all the revissions in then test it on a dummy
repository first and ensure it can deal with errors
the precommit check script might reject changes due to whitespace/tab issues
or there might be a conflicting commit in the middle (extreemly unlikely i
know, but the script should stop if something unexpected happens ...)
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not
or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and
the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070508/c5e925d7/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list