On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:28:59PM +0100, Matthias Neugebauer wrote:

See FFmpeg patch: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/F7848CEE-46C1-4CAF-9191-A7... --- docs/nut.txt | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/nut.txt b/docs/nut.txt index 3641c01..ea49eba 100644 --- a/docs/nut.txt +++ b/docs/nut.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ================================== -NUT Open Container Format 20201104 +NUT Open Container Format 20201120 ==================================

This doesnt apply as the whitespaces seem to have been mangled by your MUA or some other part of the mail pipeline

@@ -1045,6 +1045,12 @@ info packet types framerates in the stream). Note, this value is just a guess! For example, if the time base is 1/90000 and all frames have either approximately 3600 or 1800 timer ticks, then r_frame_rate will be 50/1. + "st_sd_displaymatrix" + Display matrix of the stream. + This stores the 3x3 display matrix of the stream as nine unsigned + integers seperated by colons. The display matrix is a side data of a + video stream and necessary for displaying the stream correctly, e.g. + rotating it.

ok but this needs to be a bit more precisse is a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 matrix stored as 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 or 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 or something else also this needs a clear definition what a display matrix is or a link / reference to some other specification which clearly defines what a display matrix is Without this there could be interoperability issues if people interpret this in different ways iam CC-ing ffmpeg-devel as i suspect there are more interrested people there to comment than on nut-devel and the subject also touches the ffmpeg implementation thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus