On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:47:10PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:53:10AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:31:32PM -0800, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:56:53AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
thats ~ 20 bytes per frame overhead or ~ 0.11% with 15k frames it would have been ~ 11 or ~ 0.07% with 2mb frames you would end up with ~ 22 byte or ~ 0.001%
Thanks, Michael. Could you do a similar sketch for vorbis audio? I tried nutmerge on a couple of files and it reported 1.2-1.5% overhead, and was curious if the claimed 2 bytes per frame is possible with vorbis.
If you modify nutmerge.c, there's a table at the top, you need to change it to this:
what about generating a more optimal table automatically? like the lavf muxer did? should all users of libnut hack the source depening on what they want to put in nut?
It's on the TODO list. :) - ods15