Hi On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:53:10AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:31:32PM -0800, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:56:53AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
thats ~ 20 bytes per frame overhead or ~ 0.11% with 15k frames it would have been ~ 11 or ~ 0.07% with 2mb frames you would end up with ~ 22 byte or ~ 0.001%
Thanks, Michael. Could you do a similar sketch for vorbis audio? I tried nutmerge on a couple of files and it reported 1.2-1.5% overhead, and was curious if the claimed 2 bytes per frame is possible with vorbis.
If you modify nutmerge.c, there's a table at the top, you need to change it to this:
what about generating a more optimal table automatically? like the lavf muxer did? should all users of libnut hack the source depening on what they want to put in nut? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB In the past you could go to a library and read, borrow or copy any book Today you'd get arrested for mere telling someone where the library is