Author: michael Date: Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 New Revision: 636 Log: maybe better? Modified: docs/nut.txt Modified: docs/nut.txt ============================================================================== --- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame. Sample code (Public Domain, & untested):
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Author: michael Date: Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 New Revision: 636
Log: maybe better?
Modified: docs/nut.txt
Modified: docs/nut.txt ============================================================================== --- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"? -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Author: michael Date: Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 New Revision: 636
Log: maybe better?
Modified: docs/nut.txt
Modified: docs/nut.txt ============================================================================== --- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
yes And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule: A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single codec frame per NUT frame. The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is. Feel free to change the wording if you think its not good ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Author: michael Date: Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 New Revision: 636
Log: maybe better?
Modified: docs/nut.txt
Modified: docs/nut.txt ============================================================================== --- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
yes
And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule: A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single codec frame per NUT frame.
The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is.
In that case, "For raw video a codec frame is one video picture" or similar seems more natural. In English, definitions begin with the entity being defined, followed by the explanation. -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31:48AM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Log: maybe better?
--- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
yes
And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule: A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single codec frame per NUT frame.
The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is.
In that case, "For raw video a codec frame is one video picture" or similar seems more natural. In English, definitions begin with the entity being defined, followed by the explanation.
Just commit ... Diego
Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> writes:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31:48AM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Log: maybe better?
--- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
yes
And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule: A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single codec frame per NUT frame.
The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is.
In that case, "For raw video a codec frame is one video picture" or similar seems more natural. In English, definitions begin with the entity being defined, followed by the explanation.
Just commit ...
I don't like committing changes when I'm not sure I've understood the intended meaning properly. -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com
participants (4)
-
Diego Biurrun -
michael -
Michael Niedermayer -
Måns Rullgård