Re: [NUT-devel] [RFC] FourCCs for rawvideo rgb4_byte / bgr4_byte
On date Friday 2010-05-21 00:14:17 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
Hi all, this follows a thread from ffmpeg-devel: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/109054/focus=109394
I proposed these names: B4BY (bgr4_byte) Packed BGR 1:2:1, 8bpp, (msb)1B 2G 1R(lsb) R4BY (rgb4_byte) Packed RGB 1:2:1, 8bpp, (msb)1R 2G 1B(lsb)
Other idea: bgr4_byte => B[1][2][1] rgb4_byte => R[1][2][1]
Note that I'm very satisfied with these names, maybe someone can find a better scheme.
What do you think?
Ping.
On 5/22/10, stefasab <stefasab@gmail.com> wrote:
On date Friday 2010-05-21 00:14:17 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
What do you think?
Ping.
this ml is pretty low volume don't expect much reaction.. for an outsider nut seems to be a dead project
On date Saturday 2010-05-22 18:32:05 +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 5/22/10, stefasab <stefasab@gmail.com> wrote:
On date Friday 2010-05-21 00:14:17 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
What do you think?
Ping.
this ml is pretty low volume don't expect much reaction..
for an outsider nut seems to be a dead project
I'm using Nut for the libavfilter test system, and Michael asked to post patches here rather than on ffmpeg-devel, thus the only reaction I espect is from Michael ;-). Regards.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 5/22/10, stefasab <stefasab@gmail.com> wrote:
On date Friday 2010-05-21 00:14:17 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
What do you think?
Ping.
this ml is pretty low volume don't expect much reaction..
for an outsider nut seems to be a dead project
yeah, no bug reports, no feature requests all the other projects have so many bugs and so many failed attempts to fix them [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the dead. -- Aristotle
participants (4)
-
Michael Niedermayer -
Stefano Sabatini -
stefasab
-
Szabolcs Nagy