I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory. svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository. enjoy Diego
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend. Diego
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend.
Files removed. I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was happy. Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the new one to 'nut' by the end of the week. While we're at it.. There are only two committers (Oded and Alex) for the NUT repository. Is that on purpose or should the usual MPlayer or FFmpeg crowd be allowed to commit? Diego
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend.
Files removed.
I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was happy. Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the new one to 'nut' by the end of the week.
While we're at it.. There are only two committers (Oded and Alex) for the NUT repository. Is that on purpose or should the usual MPlayer or FFmpeg crowd be allowed to commit?
I wasn't even aware of this. I have no objection to allowing all... if anybody does anything I don't want, easily noticable by mailing list... - ods15
Hi On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend.
Files removed.
I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was happy. Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the new one to 'nut' by the end of the week.
While we're at it.. There are only two committers (Oded and Alex) for the NUT repository. Is that on purpose or should the usual MPlayer or FFmpeg crowd be allowed to commit?
well i guess i as main author of the nut spec should have commit access to it at minimum also i think "everyone" should have commit access ... btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all now, simply becasue they cause work for everyone and svn (at least all repos where iam maintainer) will be changed to git (or less likely mercurial) IMO svn has reached the end of its usefullness ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be. -- Socrates
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all
It's also been my experience that having separate svn repositories causes pain later on. Since svn doesn't have built in support for distributed merges, you can't put things back together again without breaking either version number references or revision lookup by date. So you need to be really sure the projects are completely separate. You've also broken all the links to xiph-oggless out there. -r
Hi On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:08:34AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all
It's also been my experience that having separate svn repositories causes pain later on. Since svn doesn't have built in support for distributed merges, you can't put things back together again without breaking either version number references or revision lookup by date.
yes, svn sucks
So you need to be really sure the projects are completely separate.
yes
You've also broken all the links to xiph-oggless out there.
ive added some short text in its place to point to the new one does that help? or do you have another suggestion how to fix it personally id revert the whole move, though iam not sure what the other developers think about that ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:43:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
ive added some short text in its place to point to the new one does that help?
That does help, thanks. Google's best link is actually http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/tech/oggless-xiph-codecs.txt Which hasn't broken yet. -r
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:58:39AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:43:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
ive added some short text in its place to point to the new one does that help?
That does help, thanks.
Google's best link is actually
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/tech/oggless-xiph-codecs.txt
Which hasn't broken yet.
Seriously, why not put up the web page again or anything really... Diego
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:08:34AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all
It's also been my experience that having separate svn repositories causes pain later on. Since svn doesn't have built in support for distributed merges, you can't put things back together again without breaking either version number references or revision lookup by date. So you need to be really sure the projects are completely separate.
Yes, we know that now. It's called the benefit of hindsight.
You've also broken all the links to xiph-oggless out there.
What links? Guys, get your act together and create a proper website. One that does not disappear every few weeks would be a plus. Diego
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend.
Files removed.
I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was happy. Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the new one to 'nut' by the end of the week.
While we're at it.. There are only two committers (Oded and Alex) for the NUT repository. Is that on purpose or should the usual MPlayer or FFmpeg crowd be allowed to commit?
well i guess i as main author of the nut spec should have commit access to it at minimum also i think "everyone" should have commit access ...
I've added the MPlayer committers.
btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all now, simply becasue they cause work for everyone and svn (at least all repos where iam maintainer) will be changed to git (or less likely mercurial) IMO svn has reached the end of its usefullness ...
Disagree strongly, but I really have no interest in flaming about this issue. Diego
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt, mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/ http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
Make sure it works as expected. If it does we can do away with the old one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained. So if there are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer repository after the weekend.
Files removed.
I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was happy. Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the new one to 'nut' by the end of the week.
Done. Diego
participants (4)
-
Diego Biurrun -
Michael Niedermayer -
Oded Shimon -
Ralph Giles