On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:47:30AM +0300, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:57:51PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:06:20PM +0200, ods15 wrote:
Author: ods15 Date: Sun Sep 24 15:06:19 2006 New Revision: 155
Added: trunk/docs/spec.txt
Log: starting point for readable spec in nut repo
i strongly object to this destruction of the history of nut.txt
if you do move the spec between repos then either do it the diego way or use a script which checks in every revision individually with author and date in the commit message
This was intended to NOT replace nut.txt, but be a readable spec instead.
Do you really mean the intention is to have two different specs?? That sounds like a very bad idea. If the intention is to have an informative (non-normative) document for people to use as a basis for understanding and implementing the spec, then "spec.txt" is a bad name for it and basing it on nut.txt is probably not useful but just misleading. Rich