On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:10:19PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:38:17PM +0300, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Måns Rullgård wrote:
Seems sensible. The problem is only with codecs that don't have an official name, like some of Mike's game stuff.
they don't have name so won't be a problem having us give them one.
Oded please comment
I have nothing to comment, I already stated, I'm fine with any suggestion. (The only suggestion I somewhat dislike is the ugly numbers one) Michael and Rich are the ones that need to comment...
How about:
audio: "mp2 " "mp3 " "ac3 " "aac " vrbs
video: mp4v/mp4s/??? (pick one among those already in use) mpg1 mpg2 h263 h264 263+ (nonconformant extensions to h263 should not be tagged h263)
comments? the basic idea of the above is to pick the "most sane" among the fourcc's already used in practice in _some_ format out there..
I'm in favor. - ods15