11 Feb
2008
11 Feb
'08
4:14 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:19:29AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Anyway if you say a timestamp would be better, i suspect rich would be harder to convince than me.
Not necessarily. If something new is needed, I want it to be whatever's best (hopefully without being invasive). A good question to ask is what stage in the content generation the buffering data would be generated at and if the choice of what to store would influence that... Rich