19 Feb
2006
19 Feb
'06
8:36 a.m.
Hi On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:17:13AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 06:40:47AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:08:41AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
Rich and I vote for throwing the tables alltogether, they are unnecessary complexity in reducing size of already redundant data... Michael, what's your vote on this?
Well this is my preference. In the absence of that, I'm willing to have a small list of essential key names, but I'd strongly prefer only including the essential, universal ones if the list will be locked forever, rather than arbitrarily including whatever we think of right now..
i agree with removing the tables completely [...] -- Michael