On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:54:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:10:42PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
2. timebase msecs is "bleh" :/
yes, but it was that way already, my proposal makes it msecs only if the packet is not for a specific stream which is better then it was ...
IMO just make the time type rational (pair of vlcs). Even then someone can decide to use msec for it and stores and extra 2 bytes for the denominator of 1000, but they're free to use correct exact values too.
iam against this, people will store every info packet in msecs then even if they are for a specific stream
i rather suggest to use a system similar to what we do in syncpoints
ok. rich