On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:54:06PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Besides that i vote for the new fourcc to be "SHIT" if we end up doing a 4cc split :)
Anyway, iam slightly leaning toward just leaving all in one 4cc. Because i just dont see any practical gain from the split, its just work, and work for which i dont vounteer ...
Can't we just say MP4V means MPEG-4 ASP? Or are there real features in use that are outside the domain of ASP?
64k will always be enough for everyone
That doesn't answer the question. Does ASP correspond directly to the currently implemented/used stuff, or not? If it does, I think we should make MP4V==ASP And I really don't see people going back and implementing features of an old standard that were essentially deemed mistakes by the userbase. If people eventually decide to try face/mesh/etc. crap in video compression, they'll do it with a newer more efficient bitstream format, not piggybacking it onto mpeg-4 asp implementations. And if I'm wrong, the SHIT fourcc is still available it seems... :-) Rich