On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:37:27PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
NUT's goal was never to copy MPEG but to redo things and do them correctly from the ground up.
Yes, and i certainly would prefer if things can be done better than mpeg. The problem ATM is that "things" can not be done.
This is a plain falsehood. No one has demonstrated anything concrete that cannot be done.
"People in the industry do it this way" is not an argument. As far as I can tell, everything done with MPEG broadcast can be done much simpler, for instance the time synchronization issue. Due to NUT's extremely strict interleaving rules, frame dts ALREADY serves as a synchronization timestamp!! There's no need for separate timestamps!
Please stop the insanity! NUT IS FINISHED. If anyone claims not, please show real, demonstratable bugs, not differences from MPEG. A difference from MPEG is not a bug but a sign of good design.
I think ive shown a few fatal deficiencies in the current design in my previous mail.
And I debunked them, yet again. Rich