17 Feb
2008
17 Feb
'08
4:05 a.m.
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> writes:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
see attached
What about this?
Any comments, alternative suggestions? objections? mans, is your comment about fourccs a objection? If so what do you suggest to identify the needed things for raw video/audio.
The diff is fine, provided those fourccs are actually specified somewhere. It's the deferring of codec tag definitions to some ill-defined AVI common practice I dislike. But we've had that discussion already... -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com