Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> writes:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31:48AM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
michael <subversion@mplayerhq.hu> writes:
Log: maybe better?
--- docs/nut.txt (original) +++ docs/nut.txt Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008 @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto codec frame per NUT frame. For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames. -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame. +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
That doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean something like "For raw video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
yes
And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule: A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single codec frame per NUT frame.
The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is.
In that case, "For raw video a codec frame is one video picture" or similar seems more natural. In English, definitions begin with the entity being defined, followed by the explanation.
Just commit ...
I don't like committing changes when I'm not sure I've understood the intended meaning properly. -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com