On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:18:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
attached patch would change nut.txt to the alternative keyframe definition
i will apply this in a few days if there are no objections
I'm not opposed to any of this in principle, but I think the wording could be clearer (more formal, less discussion of rationale which belongs in a separate section imo).
Iam not in favor of (re)moving explanations and discussions. Its more understandable if explanations are close to where they are needed. This reminds me of the h.264 spec where early versions where quite understandable. And which then where changed to be exact and precisse with no explanations to the point that it was not understandable anymore. anyway a seperate much bigger explanations and rationale section is of course very important anyway. But IMO removing explanations from all other sections is not a good idea. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope