21 Nov
2006
21 Nov
'06
7:12 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 10:13:46PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:13:37PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
strongly opposed to any of the implementation-specific names though. as soon as you go down that path, you wind up with the trouble of players omitting support for certain implementations and then implementations must lie that they're actually a different implementation...
ok, i really dont mind how the codec tag issue is solved, as long as it is so lets checkin the sane fourcc table from oded and use that with a fallback to the avi-riff tags for muxing and demuxing?
So whats the decision? We commit this table? - ods15