On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:12:12PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:12:14AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 10:13:46PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
ok, i really dont mind how the codec tag issue is solved, as long as it is so lets checkin the sane fourcc table from oded and use that with a fallback to the avi-riff tags for muxing and demuxing?
So whats the decision? We commit this table?
i abstain from voting on this, if rich says ok or abstains too and you dont vote against your own table :) then commit it (after dealing with the nitpicking below)
"snow" Snow "drac" Dirac/Schroedinger "vc1 " VC-1
BTW I'm actually not sure if 'vc1 ' is a good fourcc, AFAIK that's wmv3, right?...
also hfyu (huffyuv), ffv1 and jpeg or mjpg should be added then rawvideo formats yv12,rgb32, ... also should be added and theora and jpeg2000 ...
You're welcome to add to the list as much as you like after it is committed...
Audio: "vrbs" Xiph.org Vorbis "mp2 " MP2 "mp3 " MP3 "ac3 " AC3 "aac " AAC/MPEG-4 Part 3 "eac3" EAC3
i dunno eac3 well enough, but is it more different from ac3 then h.263 is from h.263+ ? if not why does it get its own fourcc while h.263+ does not?
I have no idea, I don't even know what EAC3 is. I removed it from the list.
and pcm*, alaw, ylaw, and some common adpcm variants should be added then theres gsm and ...
Again, add as you like after commit. I think for the most part we can assume we like each other's fourcc's, there's no need to discuss before committing - if something is bad we'll find out and yell at svnlog... Is this acceptable? Updated list below. Rich, waiting for your OK (or abstain) on this. - ods15