On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:41:51PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:33:22AM +0100, michael wrote:
Log: 3 more issues which have come up in the past but have IIRC never been resolved.
--- docs/nutissues.txt (original) +++ docs/nutissues.txt Tue Feb 12 00:33:21 2008 +Issue small-frames +------------------ +The original intent of nut frames was that 1 container frame == 1 codec +frame. Though this does not seem to be explicitly written in nut.txt.
It is.
+Also it is inefficient for very small frames, AMR-NB for example has 6-32 +bytes per frame.
I don't think anyone really cares that much about efficiency when storing shit codecs in NUT. Obviously any good codec will use large frame sizes or compression will not be good.
Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I think AMR currently is the best quality speech codec... Diego