Hi On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 05:41:54AM +0300, Oded Shimon wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:16:03PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Ivan Kalvachev" <ikalvachev@gmail.com> writes:
Before continuing flame, I would like to know if we are going to use fourcc, will we create our own list or just use the avi one?
I believe the idea was to use a reduced avi 4cc list, that is with only one code per codec.
On a side note, I still think there is way to much fixation on the 4cc thing in the first place, but that's probably just me...
Resuming bikeshed topic. Warning, no replies within 7 days is taken as no complaints.
alternative suggestion: fourcc identification for the codec MUST be <=4 bytes long SHOULD be made of alphanumerical chars the exact values are outside of the scope this spec if a codec specifies a prefered identifer which fits within the constraints of this syntax element then it SHOULD be used, if a codec is commonly using a identifer which fits within the constraints of this syntax element in another container format then that identifer SHOULD be used if there are several possible values to choose from then the one used in the source file if any SHOULD be prefered, if there are still several options left then the one with the most descriptive name SHOULD be preferred [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB In the past you could go to a library and read, borrow or copy any book Today you'd get arrested for mere telling someone where the library is