----- Original Message ----- From: xi <xizard@enib.fr> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 01:49:00 +0000 To: "MPlayer user's list." <mplayer-users@mplayerhq.hu> Subject: Re: [MPlayer-users] mplayer +vesa
[Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html] Francisco J. Le�n wrote:
[Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html] Just great. vm86.h is exactly the same in glibc 2.2.4 and 2.3.1. The only thing that changes is that since both include <asm/vm86.h>, that gets taken from the current kernel.
Ok, the headers files are identicals, but this doesn't prove that the implementation didn't changed.
So, to the guy that said that 2.2.4 worked maybe it was because it was compiled with a different kernel than in 2.2.5
Ok, you are right. I suppose glibc-2.2.5 I tried was built with 2.4.19 kernel, and glibc-2.2.4 with kernel 2.4.8 (not sure).
So to confirm, i should buid glibc-2.2.4 with kernel 2.4.19, but I don't have much time now.
Francisco J. Le�n A. VII Semestre de Lic. en Computaci�n Maracaibo, Edo. Zulia, Venezuela
Xavier
The problem is lrmi.c. It uses syscall 113 (vm86old) which is now obsolete. It needs to be rewritten to use vm86. -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze