CVS: main/DOCS/man/en mplayer.1,1.888,1.889
CVS change done by Loren Merritt CVS Update of /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/man/en In directory mail:/var2/tmp/cvs-serv1654 Modified Files: mplayer.1 Log Message: List the 'context' option for the ffvhuff codec. Index: mplayer.1 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/man/en/mplayer.1,v retrieving revision 1.888 retrieving revision 1.889 diff -u -r1.888 -r1.889 --- mplayer.1 22 Feb 2005 21:49:08 -0000 1.888 +++ mplayer.1 22 Feb 2005 22:31:20 -0000 1.889 @@ -6444,6 +6444,15 @@ large context model .RE .PD 1 +(for ffvhuff) +.PD 0 +.RSs +.IPs 0 +predetermined huffman tables (built in or two pass) +.IPs 1 +adaptive huffman tables +.RE +.PD 1 . .TP .B qpel\ \ \
Loren Merritt CVS writes:
+predetermined huffman tables (built in or two pass)
Aren't you missing "one" here? Diego
Loren Merritt writes:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Loren Merritt CVS writes:
+predetermined huffman tables (built in or two pass)
Aren't you missing "one" here?
No, it either uses the built-in table, or generates one in 2-pass mode.
OK, now I get it, you meant "builtin". This typo actually had me confused.. Diego
Hi, On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:31:24 +0100 (CET), Loren Merritt CVS <syncmail@mplayerhq.hu> wrote:
CVS change done by Loren Merritt CVS @@ -6444,6 +6444,15 @@ large context model .RE .PD 1 +(for ffvhuff) +.PD 0 +.RSs +.IPs 0 +predetermined huffman tables (built in or two pass) +.IPs 1 +adaptive huffman tables
Wouldn't it be wise to add what is the advantage of either option? My guess is that adaptive is better (I'm maybe wrong), but what does the average user may think? Regards, Guillaume
participants (4)
-
Diego Biurrun -
Guillaume Poirier -
Loren Merritt -
syncmail＠mplayerhq.hu